JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 1 October 2015 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — DirectiveEC — Articles 4(1) and 28(1)

Source URL: statewatch.org

Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 9, No. 6, November 2014, pp. 558–571 Gender differences in the endowment effect: Women pay less, but won’t accept less Alice Wieland∗

Source URL: www.decisionsciencenews.com

Reviving the Declaratory Judgment: A New Path to Structural Reform EMILY CHIANG† INTRODUCTION We stand on the cusp of a new era in public interest litigation, one that has been several decades in the making

Source URL: www.buffalolawreview.org

UNIFORM CHANCERY COURT RULES Table of Rules 1.00

Source URL: courts.ms.gov

• Law
• Civil law common law)
• Legal documents
• Legal procedure
• Civil procedure
• Notary
• Motion in United States law
• Judicial disqualification
• Court of Chancery
• Continuance
• Summary judgment
• Supreme Court of the United States

MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT Adopted by Administrative Order on August 27, 2008. Statement of Policy Regarding Openness and Availability of Public Records 1. Introduction

Source URL: courts.ms.gov

• Freedom of information in the United States
• Privacy
• Public records
• Supreme Court of the United States
• Judgment
• South African law
• California Public Records Act
• Civil procedure in South Africa

Scott v. Sandford Mr. Justice NELSON. I shall proceed to state the grounds upon which I have arrived at the conclusion, that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed. The suit was brought in the court below by

Source URL: landmarkcases.c-span.org

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 6 October 2015 * (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Personal data — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of such data — Charter of Fundamental Rights of t

Source URL: cdt.org

• Information privacy
• Data Protection Commissioner
• Data Protection Directive
• Privacy
• European Data Protection Supervisor
• European Union law
• Personally identifiable information
• Bundesdatenschutzgesetz
• Max Schrems

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 1 October 2015 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — DirectiveEC — Articles 4(1) and 28(1)

Source URL: www.statewatch.org

Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 4, July 2012, pp. 383–389 Ambiguity aversion in a delay analogue of the Ellsberg Paradox Bethany J. Weber∗ Wah Pheow Tan†

Source URL: www.decisionsciencenews.com

Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 9, No. 5, September 2014, pp. 420–432 Numeric and graphic risk information processing of high and low numerates in the intuitive and deliberative decision modes: An eye-tracker study

Source URL: www.decisionsciencenews.com